The dreaded bye rounds are here folks …. more than ever it’s a time when we need to support one another. So Far …. The Good – Stef Martin, Barlow, Yeo, Rocky, Wellsy The Bad – Priddis, Goldy, Rich, Chad & Robbie The Ugly – Gibson, Gunston, …. ROOKIES How are you travelling? Categories: Supercoach 283 Comments Dave Ruddick · 18/06/2016 at 19:29 Brought in Martin…upgraded Cox to Martin and kept Nic Nat at this stage and will decide what to do with him later….Now I know this sounds like a BS story but its true….By accident I had Barlow as Captain and Danger as VC. I had intended to VC Danger and loophole him but somehow ended up putting the big C on Barlow…pulled one right out of my backside…of course Danger could still get more than 160. discojim · 18/06/2016 at 19:31 Well done Dave. You deserve it …. you've been a good JR Community man for a long time. Good Karma to you! Mudguts · 18/06/2016 at 20:47 Absolutely love it! Gave me a great laugh. Well done! Scyb · 19/06/2016 at 14:45 and he did get 160+! Darren F · 18/06/2016 at 19:44 The bye rounds really smoke pole! Needs to be one weekend only. Jock you need to get Gillon into the bungalow and vehemothly debate the relevance of three bye rounds. Southern S · 19/06/2016 at 12:28 I find the byes interesting and you just know that lots of people are going to stuff up and you can make ground in ranks and league wins. Last Activity · 18/06/2016 at 19:54 dont forget to click me to read the latest comments Kev · 18/06/2016 at 19:57 I'm just gonna stop wearing pants whenever Danger plays footy. Costing me a small fortune to replace the stretched jeans every week min0008 · 18/06/2016 at 20:00 Got rid of Stef 4 weeks ago for Goldy and he finally has delivered but Goldy scored OK. On 629/7 with Dangerfield as captain and only have 17 on field wombatsfc · 18/06/2016 at 22:56 Don't worry min Stef scored well against the eagles 3rd best ruck option he'll continue to be a spud against teams with their best ruck playing. Demons got rid of him because he's softer than a fairy fart, punch him in the guts in the first qrtr and he doesn't get another contested ball. It took him 5 weeks to recover from a simple shirtfront that Simmo would have walked away from and tonned up. min0008 · 18/06/2016 at 23:25 I agree Wayno76 · 19/06/2016 at 03:30 Didn't u watch any footy last year wombatsfc · 19/06/2016 at 14:27 Its round 13 what relevance are last years performances under a different scoring system for rucks. A bloke currently at the bombers was also a great ruck for 1 year at the lions I suppose his current 3 game ave of 89 makes him a viable option as well maybe he should be a lock with his DPP status. Malceski had a great year last year perhaps I should pencil him in for my D6 Rooster XXX · 20/06/2016 at 13:09 Malceski didn't have a great year last year? Tommo · 19/06/2016 at 10:45 Completely disagree. Did you not watch him last year? He averaged 111 from 20 games. Second best ruck in the comp last year mate. Pete · 19/06/2016 at 18:32 Well i traded Martin in for Nic Nat after I looked at his remaining draw and with games against Gold coast, Richmond, Gws, Essendon and Port in the next 5 games, I see Mumford as the only tough ruck duel for him. Early days but it might be the difference between getting pendlebury in my side or not. Rooster XXX · 20/06/2016 at 11:35 Stupid statement. Only reason Martin scoring has been down is due to the fact West has been playing meaning a different role for Martin where he has been splitting his time b/w ruck and forward. Quite simply this is the same for any ruckmen in the comp is they are splitting the ruck duties 50/50 then scoring will be down. Unlike some of the high scoring ruckmen in the comp Martin generates his points more through high possession counts rather than hit outs so when he is able to roam around as the sole ruckmen and pick up 20 possies and supplement that with some hitouts he has a very high ceiling. That being the case when he gets to play a fantasy friendly role as the sole ruckmen he is a very solid options and is without doubt a proven premium ruckmen in all forms of fantasy football. There is no doubt that if Martin continues to play as the role ruckmen without West in the side is incredibly under priced and would be more than capable of averaging in excess of 100 for the remainder of the season. josh · 18/06/2016 at 20:02 if i have danger as vc, if i put the captain on a player that has the bye i still get double points for vc yeah? Kev · 18/06/2016 at 20:15 Yep Thomas · 18/06/2016 at 20:19 Can someone confirm if we can loophole during bye rounds? Also, Rance, Enright or Savage? I need a POD Danners · 18/06/2016 at 22:05 Yes and Rance is a solid option Jess_coach · 18/06/2016 at 20:42 When Rockliff's 130 isn't enough, so you captain Dangerfield ✌✌✌ Southern S · 18/06/2016 at 21:15 You not only threw the rule book out the window you burnt the thing. Danger is in stellar form though good move looks like it's gonna pay off. 50_Shades · 18/06/2016 at 22:13 I traded in Bartel and Selwood today and had the VC on Danger… Feels like a good day 🙂 Jess_coach · 18/06/2016 at 22:49 Nice 50 shades. Thats the three top scorers ! 50_Shades · 19/06/2016 at 00:45 Yep, every one I know has been downgrading so I was starting to doubt the plan – glad i saw it through. Good call on your part too! Is it enough to get you the win? Jess_coach · 19/06/2016 at 09:59 Yes im in five leagues and have only lost 2 league games all year Southern S · 19/06/2016 at 12:27 Nice one. I got bartel when he was about 450k he's been so reliable. Cameron · 18/06/2016 at 21:05 Would you rather keep wines at m8 or kerridge at f6? Southern S · 18/06/2016 at 21:17 Kerridge. Lock in a mid premo that will pump out big scores. Danners · 18/06/2016 at 22:04 Wines at M8 wombatsfc · 18/06/2016 at 22:58 Keep Kerrige, both are only bench players post byes and kerridge covers 2 lines. Billioux · 18/06/2016 at 21:06 Would still like clarity to previous thread, re CLUB BYES TOP18 scorers re VC C loophole. I assume u all understand that SC rule.. I dont. Thanks 4 previous input. Neverweaken · 18/06/2016 at 22:04 I'm taking Dangers VC score. So I have moved C from Gawn to Dustin Martin who is on the ground but with the bye. Billioux · 18/06/2016 at 22:12 Danger gun. think it cool,however wat if Dusty is deemed not in your top 18 scorers.As per rules para 5 then no good. I getting hung upon jargon i know. Good VC Nweaken hedski · 18/06/2016 at 21:26 Glad I kept Barlow. Sh!##y I punted Wells (Priddis) Glad I vcd Danger. Suckling looking good. Go cats. Neverweaken · 19/06/2016 at 11:59 Punted wells but brought him back again. Southern S · 19/06/2016 at 12:26 That was a bold move that has paid off. Chuboi · 18/06/2016 at 21:29 Can you use a bye player and put the C on him to claim a VC score? Would then put playing player on bench as emergency. Danners · 18/06/2016 at 22:03 Yes Neverweaken · 18/06/2016 at 22:05 You have no bye players on the field? Chuboi · 18/06/2016 at 22:12 None, due to trading fattened rookies with the bye down to bubble rookies without the bye. Next week will trade premos with the bye from this round in. Will use 9 trades throughout byes but will have good scores throughout byes and hopefully will emerge with full premo. Tommo09 · 18/06/2016 at 21:38 I will obviously take Dangers score so do I do the usual thing Will the E score of shaw count towards my top 18 or will I have to keep Shaw C Danners · 18/06/2016 at 22:03 Put the C on a bye player to get Danger's score. Otherwise it should count tophawk · 18/06/2016 at 21:45 Brought in Steffo Martin and Rocky this week. Put the VC on Rocky. Took his score over Danger. Danger goes mad again. wow. I guess you can't win them all. Cam_H · 18/06/2016 at 22:05 130 Captain's score is 'bankable' … occasionally your back-up will fire … Danger could have 'done a knee' in the first 5 minutes of the game for all you know. You did the conservative thing – sometimes it works, sometimes not so much. It's not a bad decision. Johnny · 18/06/2016 at 22:43 I had the Vc on gray, missed danger this week 🙁 your not the only one Shags · 18/06/2016 at 21:56 Gotta say wrapped I didn't, take Rockys VC and stuck with Danger. Just wasn't sure how (if) the loophole worked through the bye, seems to be some uncertainty about this so the risk payed off this week anyway. Hawks · 18/06/2016 at 22:03 I hate barracking for Geelong players, but Danger (C), Selwood & Bartel, about 600 SC points between them Johnny · 18/06/2016 at 22:05 Cannot believe I Vc gray over danger especially after last week wow Billioux · 18/06/2016 at 22:14 ok I am over my self re C/vc Top 18 rule. If u all think it ok,no worries. Maybe read it tho,perhaps. Grantc · 18/06/2016 at 22:30 I'm glad I took the risk and went Danger over the vc on Rockcliff, the interpretation of the rules are confusing at best but I guess after this week we will know if the loophole works or not. If not there maybe a few people venting if so a few people gloating. johnno2908 · 18/06/2016 at 22:59 Ok, after reading this for the 50000th time, I think I have finally interpreted this weird way of writing. Lets say you captain a player and he scores 5 and goes off with a knee injury, his captains score would be 10. Lets say you have 19 scoring players and all 18 other players score over 11. Your captains score is not in your best 18 so will not count to your round score, however it is still technically your captains score thus your VC does not get doubled Iamme · 18/06/2016 at 22:20 Had VC on Rocky and put the C on Shaw…coz I figured lighting wouldn't strike twice for Danger…how wrong I was. Just hope Shawy tracks them up against the bombers tomorrow, I think he should. Southern S · 19/06/2016 at 12:15 Doubt it because GWS will be kicking goals all day long? Iamme · 18/06/2016 at 22:21 racks Tommy · 18/06/2016 at 22:24 I am thinking about getting rid of Libba. Trade him to Sloane next week? Steeeve · 19/06/2016 at 03:25 I can honestly see them averaging about the same from here on, but sloane more consistent Southern S · 19/06/2016 at 13:51 The upside is you'll have a POD that is only in 5% of teams. Kev · 18/06/2016 at 22:25 This was in Herald Sun's supercoach preview article from a few days ago. "All the unavailable players remain live across the weekend, as if they are playing in the last game of the round.," So there ya go, stop asking Grantc · 18/06/2016 at 22:37 Of the SuperCoach website. Set a Captain (and Vice Captain) as you normally would for double points. If your Captain's doubled score is NOT in your Best 18 scores, then their points will not count – you simply get your Best 18 scores only. Similarly, if your Captain's doubled-score is NOT in your Best 18 scores, you do NOT automatically receive double points from your Vice Captain – your Vice Captain only receives double points as per any other round, if your Captain does not play for any reason. josh · 18/06/2016 at 22:29 1509 after 12. danger captain. going solid so far Johnny · 18/06/2016 at 22:45 Crazy score! wombatsfc · 18/06/2016 at 23:07 1121 from 8 with Danger as C. Gawn, TMitch, ZMerret, Parker, Shaw, Zaha, ZWilliams, McTip, Petracca, Trengove to play 1900 looking like par HallyM8 · 18/06/2016 at 22:34 Thoughts on keeping Tippett until he comes back to be a r3/f7 or will he be out for too long Tommo · 18/06/2016 at 22:49 Will be out for too long to hold. Banned_34 · 19/06/2016 at 10:03 I read he may be out until finals Sarah · 18/06/2016 at 22:46 What's par this week? Pauly Walnuts · 18/06/2016 at 22:53 Dunno Sarah, I'm projected to get 1963 atm , and I will happy with that after not replacing Nic Nat Nigel · 18/06/2016 at 23:01 1900-1950 which is like a 2300-2350 in a normal week. tophawk · 18/06/2016 at 23:12 It will be 2000+ IMO. Especially after Danger's, Jelwood's and Bartel's performances tonight. All three are heavily backed by coaches. Wayno76 · 18/06/2016 at 23:05 Hey community just a little help with captain choices. I've got L. Neale as my VC at 149 but I want to win this league match in my own league against a friend and he has Danger as captain at 346 the only decent choices I have for captain it Gawn or Shaw. Is it worth putting the C one one of them , thinking Gawn has no Tippet and Shaw has Bombers to hope for a better score than Danger…. Or should I just keep Neales score ? Pauly Walnuts · 18/06/2016 at 23:10 Bank Neales mate Wayno76 · 19/06/2016 at 03:34 Cheers I was thinking that just thought someone would talk me into doing a risky move haha I'll bank Neales Cam_H · 18/06/2016 at 23:41 Am I wasting cash to bring in Docherty next week when Suckling would seem to do more than adequately in my final D1-D6 at $160,000 cheaper? 50_Shades · 19/06/2016 at 00:40 Gotta have the Doc. red5jc · 19/06/2016 at 13:00 I'm bringing him in SC Ace · 18/06/2016 at 23:50 Thought Danger was on target for another double ton at half time but fell well short in the end (tagged 2nd half, inj?). Have the VC on him, should I take his score or see if Gawn can go bigger against a ruckless Sydney? 50_Shades · 19/06/2016 at 00:40 Are you serious? Southern S · 19/06/2016 at 12:13 pfft you're funny. Sinclair and Nankervis aren't ruckmen? Starkingdom · 19/06/2016 at 12:21 good luck Derek · 18/06/2016 at 23:59 Roller coaster weekend. RGray, Wingard, Rich, Stewart and Collins not able to crack 80, but then to have Barlow, Rocky, Danger, Bartel and Even Blitz pump out big scores, don't know whether to be glad or sad.Reckon I'm looking around 1950-2000 with players left. Only have 18 playing so have to take everyone's scores Is there anyone who has at least 20 playing this week? Iamme · 19/06/2016 at 00:14 Got 22 Moustachio · 19/06/2016 at 00:18 Yes 20, but I have Gunston and Gibson zzzzz johnno2908 · 19/06/2016 at 08:19 I have 20, but almost a full bench of premiums so lots of rookies on ground. Couple that with some underperforming premos and a fair few scores in the 70s, even with rockliff, barlow, and Danger C I am still only looking at 1900 to 2000. Hoping for a good Sunday. hedski · 19/06/2016 at 11:08 I have 21. Bottom 3 scores so far are gibbo adams and collins I think. With danger cap and not counting those 3 I'm @ 1350 with parker gawn petracca trengove shaw zaha and tippa to go. David · 19/06/2016 at 00:01 Have vc on danger if I put capt now on say kerridge will I get dangers score?? Thanks community for advise. 50_Shades · 19/06/2016 at 00:39 Yes you will Alex · 19/06/2016 at 00:09 Can someone please explain this to me, I'm a little confused. I have 17 players on the ground and have a player selected as a EMG who played and scored. Now it says that your score is from your best starting 18 players and no bench. But then it says that if you have further players available. You can set EMGs. And they will continue to replace non starting players in your 22 including bye players. And that their score will only count of its in your best 18. I'm not sure if that means my EMG players score will be recorded or if it will be discarded as I have a player in the same position that has his bye.Anyone know what the deal is community? Neverweaken · 19/06/2016 at 12:04 I think you emergency player score will be counted against a bye player. But you're right it's confusing or we supercoachers are making it confusing. Why didn't you just put your emergency on the ground? 50_Shades · 19/06/2016 at 00:47 The life of supercoach Nicholas · 19/06/2016 at 00:48 Menadue or Macpharson to Phillips from collingwood? If I go menadue I can go Nic Nat to Goly next week whereas macpharson leaves me with nic nat to martin and a lot of cash and still leave me with a dpp forward/mid in the centre. Leaning towards trading out Macpharson as maybe Menadue gets a game and I am struggling to field 18 for the next two weeks Pauly Walnuts · 19/06/2016 at 09:46 I'm not getting carried away with Martins score, I'll be going Nic Nat to Goldy, I would have done it this week but his price will come down further. Go Menadue ,I have Macpherson also,he can be your donut if required Nicholas · 19/06/2016 at 12:28 If I go macpherson I will have a handy swing between mids and forwards whereas trading out menadue leaves me with no swing Jacko · 20/06/2016 at 12:54 Phillips from collingwood is a mid/fwd so he will still provide you with that handy swing. Just trade whoever you need to trade to get GOLDY in Tommo09 · 19/06/2016 at 08:02 This will sound crazy I am not sure about taking Dangers score. I probably will but am not certain about it I think Shaw might go HUGE and beat dangers score I may keep Shaw as C. If it pays off it could be really good for me but if it backfires I could be in some trouble. johnno2908 · 19/06/2016 at 08:11 Is there even any reward vs the risk. If he scores 200 you gain 27 points. He scores 130 you lose 43 points. He gets injured. .. good luck either way though. I reckon shaw and gawn will both go 150+ Tommo09 · 19/06/2016 at 08:11 Actually I will take Dangers score Is there any chance Grimley will play. I will put the C on him I don't want to risk it with a bye player johnno2908 · 19/06/2016 at 08:21 Definitely works with a bye player. I untwisted their words above: Lets say you captain a player and he scores 5 and goes off with a knee injury, his captains score would be 10. Lets say you have 19 scoring players and all 18 other players score over 11. Your captains score is not in your best 18 so will not count to your round score, however it is still technically your captains score thus your VC does not get doubled Tommo09 · 19/06/2016 at 08:30 So if you put a bye player as C and therefore it is not in your best 18 and VC is doubled and your emergency is counted in your best 18 Is that right? johnno2908 · 19/06/2016 at 09:03 "If you have further available players in any position during these multi-bye rounds, you may set Emergencies for those positions as usual. Emergencies will continue to replace non-starting players in your Starting 22 with the usual rules, in the same position (including any 'bye' player that you may have left in your Starting 22) and their score will only count if it is in your Best 18" red5jc · 19/06/2016 at 13:03 A bird in the hand…..Take danger. The ball might not get to the backline much Tommo09 · 19/06/2016 at 08:48 Rance or Enright? Rance for points Enright for a POD I will get JJ when he comes back and this is my last position in defence CapTkAoS · 19/06/2016 at 09:01 I'm in the happy position of having 20 starters. And looking around my leagues matches, there seems to be very few who don't have at least 18 starters this week. I've only used 2 trades. Mitch brown is still stinking up my team and probably will be among my lowest scores. Gunna dip into the war chest and swap him for gaz or dusty via some dpp swings before today's games. Should help me for the following 2 weeks. Any reason I shouldn't do it? Kev · 19/06/2016 at 16:41 Week is a long time in footy mate. Reckon next week a good chunk of us will be screwed no matter what. Just trade as normal Tommo05 · 19/06/2016 at 09:08 shaw or hannebery captain? I N Pieman · 19/06/2016 at 09:26 Shaw Starkingdom · 19/06/2016 at 12:20 Hannas I N Pieman · 19/06/2016 at 09:26 Damn Danger! 2 weeks in a row I've missed his C score Moustachio · 19/06/2016 at 12:15 Think Danger simply must be VC'd from here on out Southern S · 19/06/2016 at 12:22 Exactly, he was the number one SC scorer before he got the 200+ last week. Has to be vice or captain according to the stats. I missed out last week wasn't about to that again. Southern S · 19/06/2016 at 12:23 to do that again* I N Pieman · 19/06/2016 at 12:38 Won't be making that mistake again. Just didn't think he'd do it again Southern S · 19/06/2016 at 13:44 Yep I had that mindset too but just had to go with the no.1 player for the year, went with the stats over the gut feeling. Bolton's Blues · 19/06/2016 at 15:49 you will VC or C him next week against the saints at SS and he will spud it up, if that happens, curse you I N Pieman I N Pieman · 19/06/2016 at 17:40 Ok I'll take full responsibility. It's only fair Alex · 19/06/2016 at 10:33 Same, Pieman, this week l took Rodcliffs 130 I N Pieman · 19/06/2016 at 10:38 Same here mate. Looked pretty good till Danger stepped out Tommy · 19/06/2016 at 10:38 I am in a bit of strife in the ruck for round 15 bye, with both Goldy and Stef Martin (Held since start…) They both have the round 15 bye, should i thinking about bringing in Lycett next week as an F6/R3. Good idea? Derek · 19/06/2016 at 11:19 You only need 18 on field next week. Positions don't matter Clarky · 19/06/2016 at 10:48 Who to upgrade to next week out of Kerridge and Libba? If i get rid of Kerridge, means Greene is my last forward while if i go Libba, means my midfield is complete. Clarky · 19/06/2016 at 10:53 Sorry, i mean which one OUT OF Kerridge and Libba do i get rid of. tdesmaele · 19/06/2016 at 11:09 Probably Libba in that scenario. Kerro's M/F swing will be handy cover. I'm planning on keeping him for that reason. I'm also sticking fat with Libba for now. Will upgrade him later on if required. Derek · 19/06/2016 at 11:18 maitherson 29 touches in seconds must play next week. Tom Bell gone for the season Southern S · 19/06/2016 at 13:42 We've seen players get 40 touches in the seconds and not get back in the AFL squads, that saying you are probably right about Mathieson. Neverweaken · 19/06/2016 at 12:11 1425 with 6 to play. Shaw, Gawn, Zaha, Tippa, Petracca and Oliver. Danger as captain. Should give me 1900 minimum. Neverweaken · 19/06/2016 at 12:14 Just realised have 19 players so will lose Stewarts 56. Hopefully should still get 1900 gator59 · 19/06/2016 at 12:15 CONFUSED,, Need help community re the VC Loophole…. I have the VC on Danger in order to get his score can i leave the C on someone like Docherty that is on field that has the bye or do i have to put the C and the Emerg on someone that is on my bench SO BLOODY CONFUSING… Pauly Walnuts · 19/06/2016 at 13:07 All good Gator, do it as you said gator59 · 19/06/2016 at 15:09 thanks pauly Tommo09 · 19/06/2016 at 12:16 Can't believe I am actually considering this Take Dangers VC score or keep Shaw as C? I think will go huge against Essendon Southern S · 19/06/2016 at 12:20 Get a grip lol. Tommo09 · 19/06/2016 at 12:23 Thanks Southern I just needed someone to tell me to pull my head in and take Dangers score Southern S · 19/06/2016 at 12:24 haha yeah you'd be kicking yourself if Shaw gets an 80, which is possible this week I reckon. tophawk · 19/06/2016 at 12:28 Shaw will probably pump out a decent score against the bombers today. I have Shaw as well. I could whack the C on him today. But I am not. I am taking Rocky's 130 as VC. PERIOD. 260 SC points out of the C/VC play is very solid. Let's say Heater does deliver a 170 today. I will get those 170 points as well and Rocky's 260. (430 points out of these two players) You will get 340 for Shaw and 130 for Rocky (470 points in total) if you had him. Your risk in contemplating your move his pretty huge for a net gain of 40 points. If Shaw get injured before half time, or has a bad day plain and simple, the price will be a lot more than a 40 point gain mate. Your call though. Good luck! Cheers Tommo09 · 19/06/2016 at 12:31 I am going to keep Dangers score I think Southern S · 19/06/2016 at 12:34 If you don't then you have a gambling problem 🙂 Southern S · 19/06/2016 at 12:19 Wow we put Goldy in 'the bad' when he gets 100 with Majak in the team too? Not a bad score by any means. Johnny · 19/06/2016 at 12:23 Bloody missed danger vc My options are hannaberry in the wet, ward or shaw?? Do I take the gamble on shaw!? Starkingdom · 19/06/2016 at 12:24 Hannas loves wet Southern S · 19/06/2016 at 12:29 Hanners Johnny · 19/06/2016 at 14:15 Lol 30 at half time. Stuffed up big time out of the race I go Starkingdom · 19/06/2016 at 14:27 not his best half (about 40), not over yet Southern S · 19/06/2016 at 15:20 Sorry Johnny 🙁 CoachDamo · 19/06/2016 at 12:27 Can anyone tell me much about Tom Phillips' job security? I need to downgrade today to bring in some cash (already bringing in Trengove) – his DPP status is useful. @RoyWetard · 19/06/2016 at 12:30 I left my decision about who to make captain out of Gawn and Shaw to a best of 7 coin flip. NBA rules so for flips 1 and 2 Gawn was heads and Shaw was tails. Flips 3 and 4 had Shaw as heads, Gawn as tails. Flip 5 had Gawn as heads, Shaw tails. 6 Shaw was heads, Gawn tails. Flip 7 was Gawn heads, Shaw tails. Ended up going Shaw, Shaw, Gawn, Gawn, Gawn, Shaw and on the final flip, it was heads so Gawn is my captain. Tommo09 · 19/06/2016 at 12:39 Love it 🙂 Let's hope it works out for you Starkingdom · 19/06/2016 at 12:38 Anyone else impressed with Tarrant, could be late charge for top six DEF prem? Southern S · 19/06/2016 at 13:40 Little early for that call after two weeks in a row of good scoring. Starkingdom · 19/06/2016 at 13:59 Good point, conservative view.. The way he's attacking the contest and taking contested grabs, I think he might of matured, and at his current price represents good value.. Neverweaken · 19/06/2016 at 17:57 Was thinking that last week. Hate paying top money for defenders. Other than Doc, Simpson, Shaw, everybody else is risky for the dollars they cost. Looking at you Gibson. Sometimes you have to go with your gut. The Ranger · 19/06/2016 at 18:33 Been really impressed with him for a while now and he was pretty good last year too. Big ball move SC wise tho. THE SALTSHAKER · 20/06/2016 at 06:43 Laird, Boyd, Bartel are worth the coin. Pittard and Gibbo Rance are risky Tommo09 · 19/06/2016 at 12:46 This is my backline premiums Shaw, Laird, Docherty Am planning to get Simpson next week and JJ later on Do I get Enright, Rance or Savage for my last spot? Am leaning towards Enright because of the Pod and proven scoring ability but Rance is averaging more I think I need the POD tophawk · 19/06/2016 at 12:49 Swimming pool (water polo) conditions at the SCG today. It is absolutely hosing down. Have a look at the BOM weather radar………….Coaches looking to execute a captain play might be safer to look for a player from the bombers-GWS match under a nice dry Etihad stadium roof. Just my one cents worth. Starkingdom · 19/06/2016 at 12:58 contested possession bonanza, JKennedy, Hanneberry, Parker, Vince, Viney, take your pick.. Starkingdom · 19/06/2016 at 13:03 Demons confident today.. steve1 · 19/06/2016 at 13:01 hi guys, heres a question without notice. anyone on your 2017 radar from essendon? could be some bargains, i suppose watson will be good value. Holty · 19/06/2016 at 15:39 if he plays next year. he is still undecided. Kev · 19/06/2016 at 16:34 Wonder how they'll set the pricing, Steve. Injury discount? Or will they be priced as what they were start of this season. Big Heppell fan. steve1 · 19/06/2016 at 17:16 Yeh im not sure Kev. Crowley was heavily discounted after his dopping suspension wasnt he? I assume it will be the same as that ( i hope anyway) yeh Heppell will be good value i agree. Johnny · 19/06/2016 at 13:56 Trade out macpharson or menadue. Trading out macpharson leaves me with a way to swap from mid to forward whereas trading menadue leaves me with none. If i trade out Macpharson am forced to go Stefan Martin whereas if I trade out Menadue I can bring in Goldy Redgumwon · 19/06/2016 at 15:50 What do you need more a DPP link of Goldy? Martin scored well again yesterday but I don't think he looked like the Martin before the hit by May. Martin may have turned things around through? Both of your Menadue and MacPherson need to be traded. In the bye rounds they only take your best 18 scores. So you can get away with fielding 18 players. Do you need Goldy next week? You can get him a lot cheaper in a couple of weeks Pauly Walnuts · 19/06/2016 at 14:58 No doubt the Luke Parker keepers will come out later whining about his SC points being down again. Liam · 19/06/2016 at 15:04 His score is lower in SC because of clangers and how tackles are counted. You get 4 points for a tackle in DT, you only get 3 in SC. There's 15-20 points gone right there. Southern S · 19/06/2016 at 15:19 No, tackles are 4 points in supercoach. Liam · 19/06/2016 at 15:21 Oh really, saw something this year that said it was 3. Oops Davonaise · 19/06/2016 at 15:05 I won't whine, no need to its a storm of a game. Just one honourable mention 13 tackles Southern S · 19/06/2016 at 15:19 They will no doubt, yet they don't know the supercoach scoring system. Pauly Walnuts · 19/06/2016 at 15:23 Correct, I'm glad I have J.McVeigh today and most of my opponents don't Davonaise · 19/06/2016 at 15:29 hey don't generalise people ok. I know 3 biggest factors in SC scoring being effected massively 1. If you don't start well it is an uphill battle to end up 90+ points 2. D/E% it needs to be 70% or more for good scoring potential 3. Clangers hurt the potential score Holty · 19/06/2016 at 15:31 True SS but to be honest, can anyone work out the scoring system? My only argument to Parker and Titch's scores are tackles aren't questioned with points. 4 points everytime. disposals however depends on their efficiency. So my query is how does Vince have a ton at this point of the game only having 3 tackles and going at 50%? To me it simply does not make any sense. Southern S · 19/06/2016 at 19:33 The scoring Effective kick 4 Points Ineffective kick 0 Points Clanger kick -4 Points Effective Handball 1.5 Points Ineffective handball 0 Points Handball clanger -4 Points Handball receive 1.5 Point Hardball get 4.5 Points Loose-ball get 4.5 Points Goal 8 Points Behind 1 Point Mark uncontested (maintaining possession) 2 Points Mark contested (maintaining possession) 6 Points Mark uncontested (from opposition) 4 Points Mark contested (from opposition) 8 Points Tackles 4 Points Free kick for 4 Points Free kick against -4 Points Hitout to Advantage 5 Points Gather from Hitout 2 Points Then there's statements like this in the scoring……….. Unlike other stats systems, Champion Data will not simply award a point for each kick, mark or handball. For example, while other games will award points for a kick no matter how far it goes or where it's directed, Champion Data will award zero points for a kick that travels less than 40 meters to a contest. I didn't see the game but Vince may have got a lot of loose ball and hard ball gets that score 4.5 points each. There's a fair few stats for SC that are impossible to account for looking at the stats given on the AFL website/fanfooty. THE SALTSHAKER · 20/06/2016 at 06:51 who does? its make believe most weeks Dangers avg 136.6 is inflated. His 229 was 40pts too much. His first half vs crows was terrible, missed targets, dropped marks, sprayed shot at goal yet at 1/2 time they had him on 60sc was totally ineffluential. Then 2weeks ago Laird had bad start 2 clangers first 10min and then decent game thereafter but they still held that start against him even though he ended up with 31d. Danger gets 5sc a handball no crap THE SALTSHAKERS · 20/06/2016 at 06:53 Laird gets 74sc they never scored him much after his poor start, crap!! Tommo09 · 19/06/2016 at 15:12 Par score this week? Tim · 19/06/2016 at 15:38 2000? Tommo09 · 19/06/2016 at 15:43 I will really struggle to get that Hawks · 19/06/2016 at 17:22 Around 1900 The Ranger · 19/06/2016 at 18:44 Not sure there is such a thing as par in the bye rounds Tommo. Everyone is doing their own thing so it's dependent on what strategy you had for these next few rounds. Johnny · 19/06/2016 at 15:37 Someone help me out up above Cameron · 19/06/2016 at 15:54 Shut up scum you will recieve no help adrian · 19/06/2016 at 15:48 so im on 1859/16.. still have ward, shaw and hopper to play.. collins is my lowest score of 59, hopefully can get around 2100 josh · 19/06/2016 at 15:50 i have 1723/16 . ward, shaw, zaharakis to play Holty · 19/06/2016 at 16:02 shoukd be right up there Adrian. good score so far. Thomas · 19/06/2016 at 17:16 Lucky I didn't captain Shaw Neverweaken · 19/06/2016 at 17:51 Lucky he is scoring what he has. Apparently had no clangers??? tuxCS · 19/06/2016 at 19:06 I'm thinking that par score for this week is something between 1900 – 1950 Harley · 19/06/2016 at 19:25 2097 very happy with that! Makes up a small amount for missing danger as Capt last week. tuxCS · 19/06/2016 at 19:44 nice score Harley! That'll shoot you up the rankings. tophawk · 19/06/2016 at 20:05 Huge score! Best I have seen so far. What is your team's name? Want to see how many places you will rocket up the rankings with that. Cheers Harley · 19/06/2016 at 20:18 Cheers guys! Rounded down to 2089 now. Still good. Team name is Harley's heroes. I fell out of the top 5000 last week to 10,000 so I'm to far back now. But I got a great team building now and can make some big inroads. More interested in seeing how high I can finish now. Harley · 19/06/2016 at 20:34 Current team is: Def: shaw, docherty, laird, B smith, Sheridan, DBJ (Collins, brown) Mid: danger, ablett, selwood, Rocky, Parker, gray, priddis, cripps ( Stewart, hopper, keays) Rick: goldy, Gawn (Wyatt) FWd: zorko, merrit, Barlow, wells, Greene, hall (petracca, Gorringe) This week Looking at going brown down to a non playing defender then upgrading DBJ to Simpson and keays or hopper up to Sloane or dusty Martin! Ben · 19/06/2016 at 19:46 Kade simpson or jimmy bartel for my final spot in defence? Hawks · 19/06/2016 at 19:48 Simpson, think Bartel will be rested for a couple of games late in the season. CaPtKaOs · 19/06/2016 at 20:56 Agree. But they will make sure he gets to 300. Sarah · 19/06/2016 at 19:50 1880, didbt put danger captain. Think I can wave goodbye top 1000 Pauly Walnuts · 19/06/2016 at 19:54 I hope Sarah you don't have a vendetta on Danger after leaving the Crows Derek · 19/06/2016 at 19:55 9/10 of my opponents had C on Danger (other had Neale) I had Rocky VC then put C on Shaw. Ended up with 1956, but surprisingly won 9/10. Very happy. Derek · 19/06/2016 at 20:03 A nice pair of 130's from McVeigh and Bartel. Very nice. Anyone looking for their last Defence upgrade could do worse than one of them Daz · 19/06/2016 at 20:15 Lucky Derek, you could of ended up on that water without a paddle. Derek · 19/06/2016 at 20:32 Missed Danger as C last two weeks. Johnny · 19/06/2016 at 21:12 Missed him this week aswell. Put hannaberry in this week and trusted him with the big C tuxCS · 19/06/2016 at 19:59 Ended up with 1962 this week, which is a tiny bit above par IMO. Top 5 players: Dangerfield (c): 346 Neale: 149 Selwood: 130 Bartel: 130 Wells: 123 Bottom 5 players: Austin: 41 Collins: 59 Adams: 62 Trengove: 67 Petracca: 73 Biggest let down was definitely R.Gray with a score of only 78. Only making one trade this week and that is: Adams to Rance. With the completion of that trade my team will look like this: Def: Shaw, Docherty, Laird, Simpson, Bartel, Rance. (Collins, Austin) Mid: Ablett, Dangerfield, Selwood, Neale, R.Gray, Pendlebury Liberatore, Hopper. (Trengove, Mathieson, Keays) Ruck: Gawn, Goldstein (Chol) Fwd: Zorko, Merrett, Hall, Wells, Kerridge, Petracca. (Cox, Menadue) 8 trades and roughly 350k will be left in the bank after the Rance trade, will be upgrading Hopper to Hannebery after his bye. Tommo · 19/06/2016 at 20:30 Nice stuff Tux! It looks to be just over par. Are you going to do another youtube video in the near future? tuxCS · 19/06/2016 at 20:36 Yeah probably mate tophawk · 19/06/2016 at 20:01 2034. I will take that. Grabbed Stefan Martin to replace Nic Nat. At a bargain $347K price tag, and no Trent "party pooper" West, it was an opportunity I had to take. 142 SC points later, it has made the difference between a good and average score this week. That's my shark move completed for 2016. Welcome!! Bruce · 19/06/2016 at 20:07 was with ya until you said 'welcome' at the end. well done but stay humble. Davonaise · 19/06/2016 at 20:46 we super coaches forget history too easily Sing too soon Kev · 19/06/2016 at 21:29 The term is so overused now it's lost all meaning. Judge it at the end of the season, we've seen what happens when West plays. tuxCS · 19/06/2016 at 22:28 What rank is your team at the moment and what is the name of it? Nigel · 20/06/2016 at 00:45 I'd be concerned about West playing still. They came up against a team with there best and second best ruckman out so they could afford to play 1….I feel West would have played if NicNat/Lycett did. I have a new rule from last year called the Parker/Smith rule where I don't select a player after a concussion GoldRush · 20/06/2016 at 02:52 You beat me in the crab stick league by 20 odd points, only league loss this week for me. well done!!! Jim · 19/06/2016 at 20:12 Who's the best option outve bartel, rance, pittard, boyd and howe? Tommo · 19/06/2016 at 20:42 Rance for me, Bartel should get rested later on in the season. alan · 19/06/2016 at 20:13 Do we get rid of petracca this week or hold Daz · 19/06/2016 at 20:24 I'm holding for bench cover. alan · 19/06/2016 at 20:26 what if i already have rose ad phillips on the bench Daz · 20/06/2016 at 10:01 Petracca has better JS. Hawks · 19/06/2016 at 20:49 I'm holding on Petracca, still a little money to make, plus good bench coverage in mids & fwds Neverweaken · 19/06/2016 at 20:16 1905 lots of rookies so can't complain. Hopefully go big next week. Thomas · 19/06/2016 at 20:30 Someone in my league got 2110 I finished with 1953 What is the highest score this week everyone has seen? john · 19/06/2016 at 20:45 2012 was the highest in my league. I got 1976 without danger as captain. Could have had 2033 if I had gone with him. Derek · 19/06/2016 at 20:46 Not that many over 2000. I saw a 2107 tops Northernsoul74 · 19/06/2016 at 21:20 2070 from me. No one else in my league broke 2000. Cozza · 19/06/2016 at 21:22 I managed 2107 this week – stoked with that – thanks Danger again!! Included some spud scored like Tucker, Stewart, Collins, Adams, etc but some great scored from Danger, Selwood, Martin, Barlow, Shaw, Rocky and Bartel TRIGGER HAPPY · 19/06/2016 at 21:58 Had a 2069 in one of my leagues but 2110 definitely highest I've seen. John · 19/06/2016 at 20:44 Everyone saying I got 2.000 plus if you more than 18 playing you have scores to be minused. JAYZ · 19/06/2016 at 20:50 It's taken away automatically Alec · 19/06/2016 at 20:47 McVeigh or Rance and Merret or Lids or Wells Tommo · 19/06/2016 at 20:58 Rance and Merrett Nicholas · 19/06/2016 at 20:56 2030 this week I am really happy with that but the next two weeks will be a struggle as I am not sure if I can field 18 each week, depending on whether Phillips from collingwood and Kade Stewart are named in the next few weeks I N Pieman · 19/06/2016 at 21:19 1935 with 6 rooks. 16 premiums, Kerridge & Weitering & spares next week. Bring that on Nicholas · 19/06/2016 at 21:43 Someone in my league 14th on the ladder got 2129. Highest I have seen so far TRIGGER HAPPY · 19/06/2016 at 21:48 Well that's it. kudos to you danger, you've done it again! Took rocky as VC this week took the C off danger only 50 points but cost me a couple of close league matches. So my vow to you danger is to run with the VC or C every week from now on. You are just too good. Pretty happy with my score this week but gibbo?? What a week to pull a stinker didn't even count in my best 18 which included collins and ruggles. Bill · 19/06/2016 at 21:52 No one cares! MY TWO CENTS · 19/06/2016 at 21:55 Bill ya dickhead this is a forum called the standing room where you share how you went and scored for the round. tophawk · 19/06/2016 at 21:56 What was your final round score? TRIGGER HAPPY · 19/06/2016 at 22:02 No where near as high as you hawk – nice one. 1860 with 6 rooks. I N Pieman · 19/06/2016 at 22:31 Horrid week for the crap rooks Kev. Keays DBJ Collins hewett all rubbish. Add Rich to that group. Petrecca & trengrove. Survival week really Bolton's Blues · 19/06/2016 at 22:35 only 1561 for me this week, 15 fit players, Collins, Dunkley, Libba, Priddas, Stewart and Trengrove failing to fire, still managed to win my money league though 😀 1 trade for sure is Byrne to Lids (Via AMT Swing) thinking AMT to Bartel, but i have 255k in the chest so ill save it till Bartel has his bye and then get him the week after that, leaving 8 trades, with Kerridge (apart from Wells and Libba) the only upgrade i need to do. Bolton's Blues · 19/06/2016 at 22:40 or i can do Byrne, AMT, Kerridge > Lids, Zorko, Bartel, all this week and still have 18 playing in both bye rounds. Right now i have 7k to spare if i do those 3 trades, if i dont, that 7k could mean i miss out on one of those players the week after next, tough one Nicholas · 19/06/2016 at 22:41 Here is my team: https://imgur.com/a/OhH5h I am in desperate need of help with my round 15 looking grimmer and grimmer the more I think about it and look for a solution. The Hall to Zorko trade last week is the main reason for this screwup and I didn't think about the consequences and now I am paying for it. I have no round 15 rookies that are worth trading so may be forced to bring in a ruckman I do not rate much from last weeks bye or this weeks bye or trade Rich next week. Was planning to go Tippa to Doch this week and even that trade is screwed over because I did not realise I would have to bench a player then. Most likely going Ben Ken to Lids this week and that is the only trade I am close to certaintly going to do this week. Any advice/ critisism is greatly appreciated for trades for the next two rounds as I cannot find and adequate solution and taking a donut next week may be my best option. Moustachio · 20/06/2016 at 09:21 You can still loophole in byes if you have say Adams that can help out your def bench overflow situation Nicholas · 20/06/2016 at 12:55 I do not have adams did you not see? winters · 19/06/2016 at 22:50 Who to trade in Sloane, Curnow, Cotchin, Steven Tommo · 20/06/2016 at 08:48 Steven Danners · 20/06/2016 at 09:46 Curnow, is a massive POD with a massive risk, but out of those four, Sloane Paul96 · 19/06/2016 at 22:58 What does the community think in trading out Libba for Sloane? I personally think its a great time with Sloane only going to get higher in price after this week. It would mean I'd have to delay another week to have a side of 22 premiums, but considering its bye rounds I wouldn't think that it is a huge issue. Love to hear the thoughts of the community as always! Derek · 19/06/2016 at 23:09 Now is the time. Crows have a great draw from here on. I'll be bringing Sloane in this week Bolton's Blues · 19/06/2016 at 23:10 At this stage you'd have to consider total points from here on out (avg etc etc) you're probably looking at more points from Sloane but is it worth the trade right now? if you have spare trades, you could do it, if you are 12 and under, id be careful Paul96 · 19/06/2016 at 23:27 Thanks mate, really something to consider. I reckon it is worth it, but being my first year I could be horribly wrong too. Ive got 13 trades going into this week, upgrading DBJ to Rance means I have full prem in defence and mid. I've still got the Tip to upgrade next week to potentially Montagna, which means I'll have a full premo team with 9 trades left. Not really sure what the plan is after that… Derek · 19/06/2016 at 23:37 Plan to get a good M9/F7. And D7 if you have the cash. Loop holing is the best way to finish season strong. Derek · 19/06/2016 at 23:37 What your team like Paul96 · 20/06/2016 at 01:37 If I plan to make the trades that I want, being; D: Shaw, Doc, Bartel, Laird, Gibson, Rance (Adams, Collins) M: Danger, Pendles, GAZ, Hanners, Parker, Sloane, Shiel, Gaff (Trengove, DMac, Jansen) R: Gawn, Martin (Grimley) F: Dusty, Barlow, Wells, Greene, Hall, Trac (AMT, Cox). Will have about $220k and 10 trades. Thinking to eventually make Gaff my M9, or potentially bring in Brodie Smith? Havent thought that far ahead. Any suggestions? Tommo · 20/06/2016 at 08:48 Exactly what i am thinking about doing this week. hedski · 19/06/2016 at 23:05 1995 this week was enough for a clean sweep of my leagues 🙂 Already smashed out my 2 trades this week. Adams and Tippa you've been great servants but BANG BLOODY BANG…Bye bye. Rance and Montagna in. Team will be. Shaw Simpson Gibson (Rug) Rance Suckers Smith (S.Col) Danger Gaz Priddis (Kedge) Parker Jelwood Gray (Trengove) Libba Zaha (Jansen) Goldy Gawn (Loersch) Dusty Zorko Barlow (Petracca) Hall Montagna Chad (Phillips) Only 7 trades left now so will be holdin tight for a bit, not the best team but it'll have to do I spose. Cheers community. Johnny · 19/06/2016 at 23:08 Fell in rankings but that bit closer to the new leader!! Was that most people's weakest round?? Or strongest?? Feel a lot are r15 loaded Tommo · 20/06/2016 at 07:14 Yeah i am very round 15 heavy, got 21 playing this week. Shark move · 20/06/2016 at 00:52 Haven't heard anyone talking about my SHARKMOVE yet. Menadue to Nankervis 84 points straight off the bat plus a new DPP link. Welcome!!! john · 20/06/2016 at 06:29 Does anyone have any word on Dahlhaus injury? I am wanting to hold if 4-5 weeks in total but with no word other than TBC on the injury list it is hard to figure if this is likely or just a pipe dream. Bolton's Blues · 20/06/2016 at 08:52 was 3-4 weeks last week, they said he may return after the bye, only a slight chance though john · 20/06/2016 at 09:56 Thanks for that – I can hold for 3-4 but worried if longer. Danners · 20/06/2016 at 09:33 The Bulldogs would want him back as soon as possible, so he should be back in 3 weeks Rooster XXX · 20/06/2016 at 11:50 Danners – well done on stating the obvious!!! Of course the Bulldogs would want him back as soon as possible!! No doubt they want Bob Murphy back as well – but if your injured your injured and he will back when fully fit, functional and at no risk of further damage by playing!! Danners · 21/06/2016 at 21:05 Young fella, remember a guy called Rory Laird when he got injured? Crows could have had him out for 3 weeks, but they didn't want to risk it and gave him an extra week off The Beard · 20/06/2016 at 09:21 COMMUNITY PLEASE THROUGH YOUR TWO CENTS MY WAY!! One of my last trades (injury allowing) Deledio in for Hall or Kerrige or Petracca Harley · 20/06/2016 at 09:25 Keep hall for now I think. Unless he is not named. Tbh I'm not that convinced in deliedio. Could get injured when you need him most. However I know anyone could, but he does have history. Plus everyone will have him now. Tommo · 20/06/2016 at 09:36 Yeah, i'm not too sure on Lids either, I reckon Montagna is probably a better pick, although you may already have him. If I was to pick out of those 3, I would get rid of Tracca as Kerridge has shown he can go big often, and Hall will come good. Derek · 20/06/2016 at 09:40 out of those i would get rid of Petracca. first year players tend to get tired in the second half of the year and need a rest or score poorly. Bolton's Blues · 20/06/2016 at 10:20 indeed they do get tired derek, but i think Petracca is still capable of holding down that F7 spot for the rest of the year. im stuck with the same decision but not considering trading petracca, keep hall or kerridge, at the moment ive kept Hall, but might change it TRIGGER HAPPY · 20/06/2016 at 10:24 I'm keeping petrecca as a f7/m9 DPP with a plan to upgrade to Dahl just on the final Kerridge will get at least another week as that 120 is still in his 3 round avg so has a bit more coin to make. AMT to either dils or joey this week with the the other one joining my team next week through Kerridge. Both have fairly high Be. The Beard · 20/06/2016 at 12:15 Thanks for feedback lads. So general consent is Petracca to go ahead of Hall (unless not named) and Kerrige? Most people seem to say not Lids? I've got Martin, Zorko, Wells who well would you take? I was taking Dahl but no point for a month+ to sit there looked at Merrett and Montagna though he worries me a bit with his real low scores… Any genuine advise on this if I don't take Lids? Daz · 20/06/2016 at 10:08 Danger at Etihad is a VC/C must now. He's always been motivated but Charlie's dangling like a carrot now. We could see something pretty special here on. TRIGGER HAPPY · 20/06/2016 at 10:17 Adams? Is he a keeper at d6? Sure had a poor game on the weekend but generally he is going OK. Not sure whether to save a trade or upgrade to rance this week or McVeigh next week? He is a bit more consistent than those two. Def will be: Shaw, laird, Simmo, doc, gibbo, Adams. Daz · 20/06/2016 at 10:21 I see him with Kerridge as being the last to be upgraded and strong sides will do this through the bye periods. Your call. breakevens · 20/06/2016 at 10:50 Are Libba and Petracca worth moving on next week? Bolton's Blues · 20/06/2016 at 10:59 if you have trades, libba yes. Petracca is capable of holding M9/F7 spot for a little longer Daz · 20/06/2016 at 11:09 Is Docherty worth the 100k spend over Rance here on? Ryan · 20/06/2016 at 11:10 Libba to Pendles? Francis · 20/06/2016 at 11:13 My current premo mids are Danger, Selwood, Ablett, Rockliff, T. Mitchell – who should the last three be? I'm thinking Hanneberry, Neale and Pendlebury, is there anyone better? breakevens · 20/06/2016 at 11:16 Thoughts on Trent Cotchin? Dropped below 100 twice this year and one of those games he was carrying a fractured cheekbone Scores of 114, 115, 122, 151 in the last 4 weeks and averages 111 this year Fresh of his bye and valued at 579k with an ownership of just 2.2% David · 21/06/2016 at 12:56 I think its being a bit hard on Priddis. He did have a smashed in nose and could only breath through his mouth because he had a cotton field up his nose. Lets see how the knockers go running 15 km worth of sprints with someone on your back (tag) under those conditions. Courageous as per usual Pridda. Comments are closed.