283 Comments

discojim · 18/06/2016 at 19:31
Well done Dave. You deserve it …. you've been a good JR Community man for a long time. Good Karma to you!

Mudguts · 18/06/2016 at 20:47
Absolutely love it! Gave me a great laugh. Well done!

Scyb · 19/06/2016 at 14:45
and he did get 160+!

Southern S · 19/06/2016 at 12:28
I find the byes interesting and you just know that lots of people are going to stuff up and you can make ground in ranks and league wins.

wombatsfc · 18/06/2016 at 22:56
Don't worry min Stef scored well against the eagles 3rd best ruck option he'll continue to be a spud against teams with their best ruck playing. Demons got rid of him because he's softer than a fairy fart, punch him in the guts in the first qrtr and he doesn't get another contested ball. It took him 5 weeks to recover from a simple shirtfront that Simmo would have walked away from and tonned up.

min0008 · 18/06/2016 at 23:25
I agree

Wayno76 · 19/06/2016 at 03:30
Didn't u watch any footy last year

wombatsfc · 19/06/2016 at 14:27
Its round 13 what relevance are last years performances under a different scoring system for rucks. A bloke currently at the bombers was also a great ruck for 1 year at the lions I suppose his current 3 game ave of 89 makes him a viable option as well maybe he should be a lock with his DPP status. Malceski had a great year last year perhaps I should pencil him in for my D6

Rooster XXX · 20/06/2016 at 13:09
Malceski didn't have a great year last year?

Tommo · 19/06/2016 at 10:45
Completely disagree. Did you not watch him last year? He averaged 111 from 20 games. Second best ruck in the comp last year mate.

Pete · 19/06/2016 at 18:32
Well i traded Martin in for Nic Nat after I looked at his remaining draw and with games against Gold coast, Richmond, Gws, Essendon and Port in the next 5 games, I see Mumford as the only tough ruck duel for him. Early days but it might be the difference between getting pendlebury in my side or not.

Rooster XXX · 20/06/2016 at 11:35
Stupid statement. Only reason Martin scoring has been down is due to the fact West has been playing meaning a different role for Martin where he has been splitting his time b/w ruck and forward. Quite simply this is the same for any ruckmen in the comp is they are splitting the ruck duties 50/50 then scoring will be down. Unlike some of the high scoring ruckmen in the comp Martin generates his points more through high possession counts rather than hit outs so when he is able to roam around as the sole ruckmen and pick up 20 possies and supplement that with some hitouts he has a very high ceiling. That being the case when he gets to play a fantasy friendly role as the sole ruckmen he is a very solid options and is without doubt a proven premium ruckmen in all forms of fantasy football. There is no doubt that if Martin continues to play as the role ruckmen without West in the side is incredibly under priced and would be more than capable of averaging in excess of 100 for the remainder of the season.

Kev · 18/06/2016 at 20:15
Yep

Danners · 18/06/2016 at 22:05
Yes and Rance is a solid option

Southern S · 18/06/2016 at 21:15
You not only threw the rule book out the window you burnt the thing. Danger is in stellar form though good move looks like it's gonna pay off.

50_Shades · 18/06/2016 at 22:13
I traded in Bartel and Selwood today and had the VC on Danger… Feels like a good day 🙂

Jess_coach · 18/06/2016 at 22:49
Nice 50 shades. Thats the three top scorers !

50_Shades · 19/06/2016 at 00:45
Yep, every one I know has been downgrading so I was starting to doubt the plan – glad i saw it through.
Good call on your part too! Is it enough to get you the win?

Jess_coach · 19/06/2016 at 09:59
Yes im in five leagues and have only lost 2 league games all year

Southern S · 19/06/2016 at 12:27
Nice one. I got bartel when he was about 450k he's been so reliable.

Southern S · 18/06/2016 at 21:17
Kerridge. Lock in a mid premo that will pump out big scores.

Danners · 18/06/2016 at 22:04
Wines at M8

wombatsfc · 18/06/2016 at 22:58
Keep Kerrige, both are only bench players post byes and kerridge covers 2 lines.

Neverweaken · 18/06/2016 at 22:04
I'm taking Dangers VC score. So I have moved C from Gawn to Dustin Martin who is on the ground but with the bye.

Billioux · 18/06/2016 at 22:12
Danger gun. think it cool,however wat if Dusty is deemed not in your top 18 scorers.As per rules para 5 then no good. I getting hung upon jargon i know. Good VC Nweaken

Neverweaken · 19/06/2016 at 11:59
Punted wells but brought him back again.

Southern S · 19/06/2016 at 12:26
That was a bold move that has paid off.

Danners · 18/06/2016 at 22:03
Yes

Neverweaken · 18/06/2016 at 22:05
You have no bye players on the field?

Chuboi · 18/06/2016 at 22:12
None, due to trading fattened rookies with the bye down to bubble rookies without the bye. Next week will trade premos with the bye from this round in. Will use 9 trades throughout byes but will have good scores throughout byes and hopefully will emerge with full premo.

Danners · 18/06/2016 at 22:03
Put the C on a bye player to get Danger's score. Otherwise it should count

Cam_H · 18/06/2016 at 22:05
130 Captain's score is 'bankable' … occasionally your back-up will fire … Danger could have 'done a knee' in the first 5 minutes of the game for all you know. You did the conservative thing – sometimes it works, sometimes not so much. It's not a bad decision.

Johnny · 18/06/2016 at 22:43
I had the Vc on gray, missed danger this week 🙁 your not the only one

Grantc · 18/06/2016 at 22:30
I'm glad I took the risk and went Danger over the vc on Rockcliff, the interpretation of the rules are confusing at best but I guess after this week we will know if the loophole works or not. If not there maybe a few people venting if so a few people gloating.

johnno2908 · 18/06/2016 at 22:59
Ok, after reading this for the 50000th time, I think I have finally interpreted this weird way of writing.
Lets say you captain a player and he scores 5 and goes off with a knee injury, his captains score would be 10.
Lets say you have 19 scoring players and all 18 other players score over 11. Your captains score is not in your best 18 so will not count to your round score, however it is still technically your captains score thus your VC does not get doubled

Southern S · 19/06/2016 at 12:15
Doubt it because GWS will be kicking goals all day long?

Steeeve · 19/06/2016 at 03:25
I can honestly see them averaging about the same from here on, but sloane more consistent

Southern S · 19/06/2016 at 13:51
The upside is you'll have a POD that is only in 5% of teams.

Grantc · 18/06/2016 at 22:37
Of the SuperCoach website. Set a Captain (and Vice Captain) as you normally would for double points. If your Captain's doubled score is NOT in your Best 18 scores, then their points will not count – you simply get your Best 18 scores only. Similarly, if your Captain's doubled-score is NOT in your Best 18 scores, you do NOT automatically receive double points from your Vice Captain – your Vice Captain only receives double points as per any other round, if your Captain does not play for any reason.

Johnny · 18/06/2016 at 22:45
Crazy score!

wombatsfc · 18/06/2016 at 23:07
1121 from 8 with Danger as C. Gawn, TMitch, ZMerret, Parker, Shaw, Zaha, ZWilliams, McTip, Petracca, Trengove to play
1900 looking like par

Tommo · 18/06/2016 at 22:49
Will be out for too long to hold.

Banned_34 · 19/06/2016 at 10:03
I read he may be out until finals

Pauly Walnuts · 18/06/2016 at 22:53
Dunno Sarah, I'm projected to get 1963 atm , and I will happy with that after not replacing Nic Nat

Nigel · 18/06/2016 at 23:01
1900-1950 which is like a 2300-2350 in a normal week.

tophawk · 18/06/2016 at 23:12
It will be 2000+ IMO. Especially after Danger's, Jelwood's and Bartel's performances tonight. All three are heavily backed by coaches.

Pauly Walnuts · 18/06/2016 at 23:10
Bank Neales mate

Wayno76 · 19/06/2016 at 03:34
Cheers I was thinking that just thought someone would talk me into doing a risky move haha I'll bank Neales

50_Shades · 19/06/2016 at 00:40
Gotta have the Doc.

red5jc · 19/06/2016 at 13:00
I'm bringing him in

50_Shades · 19/06/2016 at 00:40
Are you serious?

Southern S · 19/06/2016 at 12:13
pfft you're funny.
Sinclair and Nankervis aren't ruckmen?

Starkingdom · 19/06/2016 at 12:21
good luck

Iamme · 19/06/2016 at 00:14
Got 22

Moustachio · 19/06/2016 at 00:18
Yes 20, but I have Gunston and Gibson zzzzz

johnno2908 · 19/06/2016 at 08:19
I have 20, but almost a full bench of premiums so lots of rookies on ground. Couple that with some underperforming premos and a fair few scores in the 70s, even with rockliff, barlow, and Danger C I am still only looking at 1900 to 2000. Hoping for a good Sunday.

hedski · 19/06/2016 at 11:08
I have 21. Bottom 3 scores so far are gibbo adams and collins I think. With danger cap and not counting those 3 I'm @ 1350 with parker gawn petracca trengove shaw zaha and tippa to go.

50_Shades · 19/06/2016 at 00:39
Yes you will

Neverweaken · 19/06/2016 at 12:04
I think you emergency player score will be counted against a bye player. But you're right it's confusing or we supercoachers are making it confusing.
Why didn't you just put your emergency on the ground?

Pauly Walnuts · 19/06/2016 at 09:46
I'm not getting carried away with Martins score, I'll be going Nic Nat to Goldy, I would have done it this week but his price will come down further.
Go Menadue ,I have Macpherson also,he can be your donut if required

Nicholas · 19/06/2016 at 12:28
If I go macpherson I will have a handy swing between mids and forwards whereas trading out menadue leaves me with no swing

Jacko · 20/06/2016 at 12:54
Phillips from collingwood is a mid/fwd so he will still provide you with that handy swing. Just trade whoever you need to trade to get GOLDY in

johnno2908 · 19/06/2016 at 08:11
Is there even any reward vs the risk. If he scores 200 you gain 27 points. He scores 130 you lose 43 points. He gets injured. .. good luck either way though. I reckon shaw and gawn will both go 150+

Tommo09 · 19/06/2016 at 08:11
Actually I will take Dangers score
Is there any chance Grimley will play. I will put the C on him
I don't want to risk it with a bye player

johnno2908 · 19/06/2016 at 08:21
Definitely works with a bye player. I untwisted their words above:
Lets say you captain a player and he scores 5 and goes off with a knee injury, his captains score would be 10.
Lets say you have 19 scoring players and all 18 other players score over 11. Your captains score is not in your best 18 so will not count to your round score, however it is still technically your captains score thus your VC does not get doubled

Tommo09 · 19/06/2016 at 08:30
So if you put a bye player as C and therefore it is not in your best 18 and VC is doubled and your emergency is counted in your best 18
Is that right?

johnno2908 · 19/06/2016 at 09:03
"If you have further available players in any position during these multi-bye rounds, you may set Emergencies for those positions as usual. Emergencies will continue to replace non-starting players in your Starting 22 with the usual rules, in the same position (including any 'bye' player that you may have left in your Starting 22) and their score will only count if it is in your Best 18"

red5jc · 19/06/2016 at 13:03
A bird in the hand…..Take danger.
The ball might not get to the backline much

Kev · 19/06/2016 at 16:41
Week is a long time in footy mate. Reckon next week a good chunk of us will be screwed no matter what. Just trade as normal

I N Pieman · 19/06/2016 at 09:26
Shaw

Starkingdom · 19/06/2016 at 12:20
Hannas

Moustachio · 19/06/2016 at 12:15
Think Danger simply must be VC'd from here on out

Southern S · 19/06/2016 at 12:22
Exactly, he was the number one SC scorer before he got the 200+ last week. Has to be vice or captain according to the stats.
I missed out last week wasn't about to that again.

Southern S · 19/06/2016 at 12:23
to do that again*

I N Pieman · 19/06/2016 at 12:38
Won't be making that mistake again. Just didn't think he'd do it again

Southern S · 19/06/2016 at 13:44
Yep I had that mindset too but just had to go with the no.1 player for the year, went with the stats over the gut feeling.

Bolton's Blues · 19/06/2016 at 15:49
you will VC or C him next week against the saints at SS and he will spud it up, if that happens, curse you I N Pieman

I N Pieman · 19/06/2016 at 17:40
Ok I'll take full responsibility. It's only fair

I N Pieman · 19/06/2016 at 10:38
Same here mate. Looked pretty good till Danger stepped out

Derek · 19/06/2016 at 11:19
You only need 18 on field next week. Positions don't matter

Clarky · 19/06/2016 at 10:53
Sorry, i mean which one OUT OF Kerridge and Libba do i get rid of.

tdesmaele · 19/06/2016 at 11:09
Probably Libba in that scenario. Kerro's M/F swing will be handy cover. I'm planning on keeping him for that reason. I'm also sticking fat with Libba for now. Will upgrade him later on if required.

Southern S · 19/06/2016 at 13:42
We've seen players get 40 touches in the seconds and not get back in the AFL squads, that saying you are probably right about Mathieson.

Neverweaken · 19/06/2016 at 12:14
Just realised have 19 players so will lose Stewarts 56. Hopefully should still get 1900

Pauly Walnuts · 19/06/2016 at 13:07
All good Gator, do it as you said

gator59 · 19/06/2016 at 15:09
thanks pauly

Southern S · 19/06/2016 at 12:20
Get a grip lol.

Tommo09 · 19/06/2016 at 12:23
Thanks Southern
I just needed someone to tell me to pull my head in and take Dangers score

Southern S · 19/06/2016 at 12:24
haha yeah you'd be kicking yourself if Shaw gets an 80, which is possible this week I reckon.

tophawk · 19/06/2016 at 12:28
Shaw will probably pump out a decent score against the bombers today. I have Shaw as well. I could whack the C on him today. But I am not. I am taking Rocky's 130 as VC. PERIOD. 260 SC points out of the C/VC play is very solid. Let's say Heater does deliver a 170 today. I will get those 170 points as well and Rocky's 260. (430 points out of these two players) You will get 340 for Shaw and 130 for Rocky (470 points in total) if you had him. Your risk in contemplating your move his pretty huge for a net gain of 40 points. If Shaw get injured before half time, or has a bad day plain and simple, the price will be a lot more than a 40 point gain mate.
Your call though. Good luck!
Cheers

Tommo09 · 19/06/2016 at 12:31
I am going to keep Dangers score I think

Southern S · 19/06/2016 at 12:34
If you don't then you have a gambling problem 🙂

Starkingdom · 19/06/2016 at 12:24
Hannas loves wet

Southern S · 19/06/2016 at 12:29
Hanners

Johnny · 19/06/2016 at 14:15
Lol 30 at half time. Stuffed up big time out of the race I go

Starkingdom · 19/06/2016 at 14:27
not his best half (about 40), not over yet

Southern S · 19/06/2016 at 15:20
Sorry Johnny 🙁

Tommo09 · 19/06/2016 at 12:39
Love it 🙂
Let's hope it works out for you

Southern S · 19/06/2016 at 13:40
Little early for that call after two weeks in a row of good scoring.

Starkingdom · 19/06/2016 at 13:59
Good point, conservative view.. The way he's attacking the contest and taking contested grabs, I think he might of matured, and at his current price represents good value..

Neverweaken · 19/06/2016 at 17:57
Was thinking that last week. Hate paying top money for defenders. Other than Doc, Simpson, Shaw, everybody else is risky for the dollars they cost. Looking at you Gibson.
Sometimes you have to go with your gut.

The Ranger · 19/06/2016 at 18:33
Been really impressed with him for a while now and he was pretty good last year too.
Big ball move SC wise tho.

THE SALTSHAKER · 20/06/2016 at 06:43
Laird, Boyd, Bartel are worth the coin. Pittard and Gibbo Rance are risky

Starkingdom · 19/06/2016 at 12:58
contested possession bonanza, JKennedy, Hanneberry, Parker, Vince, Viney, take your pick..

Starkingdom · 19/06/2016 at 13:03
Demons confident today..

Holty · 19/06/2016 at 15:39
if he plays next year. he is still undecided.

Kev · 19/06/2016 at 16:34
Wonder how they'll set the pricing, Steve. Injury discount? Or will they be priced as what they were start of this season.
Big Heppell fan.

steve1 · 19/06/2016 at 17:16
Yeh im not sure Kev. Crowley was heavily discounted after his dopping suspension wasnt he? I assume it will be the same as that ( i hope anyway) yeh Heppell will be good value i agree.

Redgumwon · 19/06/2016 at 15:50
What do you need more a DPP link of Goldy? Martin scored well again yesterday but I don't think he looked like the Martin before the hit by May. Martin may have turned things around through? Both of your Menadue and MacPherson need to be traded. In the bye rounds they only take your best 18 scores. So you can get away with fielding 18 players. Do you need Goldy next week? You can get him a lot cheaper in a couple of weeks

Liam · 19/06/2016 at 15:04
His score is lower in SC because of clangers and how tackles are counted. You get 4 points for a tackle in DT, you only get 3 in SC. There's 15-20 points gone right there.

Southern S · 19/06/2016 at 15:19
No, tackles are 4 points in supercoach.

Liam · 19/06/2016 at 15:21
Oh really, saw something this year that said it was 3. Oops

Davonaise · 19/06/2016 at 15:05
I won't whine, no need to its a storm of a game.
Just one honourable mention 13 tackles

Southern S · 19/06/2016 at 15:19
They will no doubt, yet they don't know the supercoach scoring system.

Pauly Walnuts · 19/06/2016 at 15:23
Correct, I'm glad I have J.McVeigh today and most of my opponents don't

Davonaise · 19/06/2016 at 15:29
hey don't generalise people ok.
I know 3 biggest factors in SC scoring being effected massively
1. If you don't start well it is an uphill battle to end up 90+ points
2. D/E% it needs to be 70% or more for good scoring potential
3. Clangers hurt the potential score

Holty · 19/06/2016 at 15:31
True SS but to be honest, can anyone work out the scoring system? My only argument to Parker and Titch's scores are tackles aren't questioned with points. 4 points everytime. disposals however depends on their efficiency. So my query is how does Vince have a ton at this point of the game only having 3 tackles and going at 50%? To me it simply does not make any sense.

Southern S · 19/06/2016 at 19:33
The scoring
Effective kick 4 Points
Ineffective kick 0 Points
Clanger kick -4 Points
Effective Handball 1.5 Points
Ineffective handball 0 Points
Handball clanger -4 Points
Handball receive 1.5 Point
Hardball get 4.5 Points
Loose-ball get 4.5 Points
Goal 8 Points
Behind 1 Point
Mark uncontested (maintaining possession) 2 Points
Mark contested (maintaining possession) 6 Points
Mark uncontested (from opposition) 4 Points
Mark contested (from opposition) 8 Points
Tackles 4 Points
Free kick for 4 Points
Free kick against -4 Points
Hitout to Advantage 5 Points
Gather from Hitout 2 Points
Then there's statements like this in the scoring………..
Unlike other stats systems, Champion Data will not simply award a point for each kick, mark or handball. For example, while other games will award points for a kick no matter how far it goes or where it's directed, Champion Data will award zero points for a kick that travels less than 40 meters to a contest.
I didn't see the game but Vince may have got a lot of loose ball and hard ball gets that score 4.5 points each. There's a fair few stats for SC that are impossible to account for looking at the stats given on the AFL website/fanfooty.

THE SALTSHAKER · 20/06/2016 at 06:51
who does? its make believe most weeks Dangers avg 136.6 is inflated. His 229 was 40pts too much. His first half vs crows was terrible, missed targets, dropped marks, sprayed shot at goal yet at 1/2 time they had him on 60sc was totally ineffluential. Then 2weeks ago Laird had bad start 2 clangers first 10min and then decent game thereafter but they still held that start against him even though he ended up with 31d. Danger gets 5sc a handball no crap

THE SALTSHAKERS · 20/06/2016 at 06:53
Laird gets 74sc they never scored him much after his poor start, crap!!

Tim · 19/06/2016 at 15:38
2000?

Tommo09 · 19/06/2016 at 15:43
I will really struggle to get that

Hawks · 19/06/2016 at 17:22
Around 1900

The Ranger · 19/06/2016 at 18:44
Not sure there is such a thing as par in the bye rounds Tommo.
Everyone is doing their own thing so it's dependent on what strategy you had for these next few rounds.

Cameron · 19/06/2016 at 15:54
Shut up scum you will recieve no help

josh · 19/06/2016 at 15:50
i have 1723/16 . ward, shaw, zaharakis to play

Holty · 19/06/2016 at 16:02
shoukd be right up there Adrian. good score so far.

Neverweaken · 19/06/2016 at 17:51
Lucky he is scoring what he has. Apparently had no clangers???

tuxCS · 19/06/2016 at 19:44
nice score Harley! That'll shoot you up the rankings.

tophawk · 19/06/2016 at 20:05
Huge score! Best I have seen so far. What is your team's name? Want to see how many places you will rocket up the rankings with that. Cheers

Harley · 19/06/2016 at 20:18
Cheers guys!
Rounded down to 2089 now. Still good. Team name is Harley's heroes. I fell out of the top 5000 last week to 10,000 so I'm to far back now. But I got a great team building now and can make some big inroads. More interested in seeing how high I can finish now.

Harley · 19/06/2016 at 20:34
Current team is:
Def: shaw, docherty, laird, B smith, Sheridan, DBJ (Collins, brown)
Mid: danger, ablett, selwood, Rocky, Parker, gray, priddis, cripps ( Stewart, hopper, keays)
Rick: goldy, Gawn (Wyatt)
FWd: zorko, merrit, Barlow, wells, Greene, hall (petracca, Gorringe)
This week Looking at going brown down to a non playing defender then upgrading DBJ to Simpson and keays or hopper up to Sloane or dusty Martin!

Hawks · 19/06/2016 at 19:48
Simpson, think Bartel will be rested for a couple of games late in the season.

CaPtKaOs · 19/06/2016 at 20:56
Agree. But they will make sure he gets to 300.

Pauly Walnuts · 19/06/2016 at 19:54
I hope Sarah you don't have a vendetta on Danger after leaving the Crows

Derek · 19/06/2016 at 20:03
A nice pair of 130's from McVeigh and Bartel. Very nice. Anyone looking for their last Defence upgrade could do worse than one of them

Daz · 19/06/2016 at 20:15
Lucky Derek, you could of ended up on that water without a paddle.

Derek · 19/06/2016 at 20:32
Missed Danger as C last two weeks.

Johnny · 19/06/2016 at 21:12
Missed him this week aswell. Put hannaberry in this week and trusted him with the big C

Tommo · 19/06/2016 at 20:30
Nice stuff Tux! It looks to be just over par. Are you going to do another youtube video in the near future?

tuxCS · 19/06/2016 at 20:36
Yeah probably mate

Bruce · 19/06/2016 at 20:07
was with ya until you said 'welcome' at the end. well done but stay humble.

Davonaise · 19/06/2016 at 20:46
we super coaches forget history too easily
Sing too soon

Kev · 19/06/2016 at 21:29
The term is so overused now it's lost all meaning. Judge it at the end of the season, we've seen what happens when West plays.

tuxCS · 19/06/2016 at 22:28
What rank is your team at the moment and what is the name of it?

Nigel · 20/06/2016 at 00:45
I'd be concerned about West playing still. They came up against a team with there best and second best ruckman out so they could afford to play 1….I feel West would have played if NicNat/Lycett did. I have a new rule from last year called the Parker/Smith rule where I don't select a player after a concussion

GoldRush · 20/06/2016 at 02:52
You beat me in the crab stick league by 20 odd points, only league loss this week for me. well done!!!

Tommo · 19/06/2016 at 20:42
Rance for me, Bartel should get rested later on in the season.

Daz · 19/06/2016 at 20:24
I'm holding for bench cover.

alan · 19/06/2016 at 20:26
what if i already have rose ad phillips on the bench

Daz · 20/06/2016 at 10:01
Petracca has better JS.

Hawks · 19/06/2016 at 20:49
I'm holding on Petracca, still a little money to make, plus good bench coverage in mids & fwds

john · 19/06/2016 at 20:45
2012 was the highest in my league. I got 1976 without danger as captain. Could have had 2033 if I had gone with him.

Derek · 19/06/2016 at 20:46
Not that many over 2000. I saw a 2107 tops

Northernsoul74 · 19/06/2016 at 21:20
2070 from me. No one else in my league broke 2000.

Cozza · 19/06/2016 at 21:22
I managed 2107 this week – stoked with that – thanks Danger again!! Included some spud scored like Tucker, Stewart, Collins, Adams, etc but some great scored from Danger, Selwood, Martin, Barlow, Shaw, Rocky and Bartel

TRIGGER HAPPY · 19/06/2016 at 21:58
Had a 2069 in one of my leagues but 2110 definitely highest I've seen.

JAYZ · 19/06/2016 at 20:50
It's taken away automatically

Tommo · 19/06/2016 at 20:58
Rance and Merrett

Bill · 19/06/2016 at 21:52
No one cares!

MY TWO CENTS · 19/06/2016 at 21:55
Bill ya dickhead this is a forum called the standing room where you share how you went and scored for the round.

tophawk · 19/06/2016 at 21:56
What was your final round score?

Bolton's Blues · 19/06/2016 at 22:40
or i can do Byrne, AMT, Kerridge > Lids, Zorko, Bartel, all this week and still have 18 playing in both bye rounds.
Right now i have 7k to spare if i do those 3 trades, if i dont, that 7k could mean i miss out on one of those players the week after next, tough one

Moustachio · 20/06/2016 at 09:21
You can still loophole in byes if you have say Adams that can help out your def bench overflow situation

Nicholas · 20/06/2016 at 12:55
I do not have adams did you not see?

Tommo · 20/06/2016 at 08:48
Steven

Danners · 20/06/2016 at 09:46
Curnow, is a massive POD with a massive risk, but out of those four, Sloane

Derek · 19/06/2016 at 23:09
Now is the time. Crows have a great draw from here on. I'll be bringing Sloane in this week

Bolton's Blues · 19/06/2016 at 23:10
At this stage you'd have to consider total points from here on out (avg etc etc)
you're probably looking at more points from Sloane but is it worth the trade right now?
if you have spare trades, you could do it, if you are 12 and under, id be careful

Paul96 · 19/06/2016 at 23:27
Thanks mate, really something to consider. I reckon it is worth it, but being my first year I could be horribly wrong too.
Ive got 13 trades going into this week, upgrading DBJ to Rance means I have full prem in defence and mid. I've still got the Tip to upgrade next week to potentially Montagna, which means I'll have a full premo team with 9 trades left. Not really sure what the plan is after that…

Derek · 19/06/2016 at 23:37
Plan to get a good M9/F7. And D7 if you have the cash. Loop holing is the best way to finish season strong.

Derek · 19/06/2016 at 23:37
What your team like

Paul96 · 20/06/2016 at 01:37
If I plan to make the trades that I want, being;
D: Shaw, Doc, Bartel, Laird, Gibson, Rance (Adams, Collins)
M: Danger, Pendles, GAZ, Hanners, Parker, Sloane, Shiel, Gaff (Trengove, DMac, Jansen)
R: Gawn, Martin (Grimley)
F: Dusty, Barlow, Wells, Greene, Hall, Trac (AMT, Cox).
Will have about $220k and 10 trades. Thinking to eventually make Gaff my M9, or potentially bring in Brodie Smith? Havent thought that far ahead.
Any suggestions?

Tommo · 20/06/2016 at 08:48
Exactly what i am thinking about doing this week.

Tommo · 20/06/2016 at 07:14
Yeah i am very round 15 heavy, got 21 playing this week.

Bolton's Blues · 20/06/2016 at 08:52
was 3-4 weeks last week, they said he may return after the bye, only a slight chance though

john · 20/06/2016 at 09:56
Thanks for that – I can hold for 3-4 but worried if longer.

Danners · 20/06/2016 at 09:33
The Bulldogs would want him back as soon as possible, so he should be back in 3 weeks

Rooster XXX · 20/06/2016 at 11:50
Danners – well done on stating the obvious!!! Of course the Bulldogs would want him back as soon as possible!!
No doubt they want Bob Murphy back as well – but if your injured your injured and he will back when fully fit, functional and at no risk of further damage by playing!!

Danners · 21/06/2016 at 21:05
Young fella, remember a guy called Rory Laird when he got injured? Crows could have had him out for 3 weeks, but they didn't want to risk it and gave him an extra week off

Harley · 20/06/2016 at 09:25
Keep hall for now I think. Unless he is not named.
Tbh I'm not that convinced in deliedio. Could get injured when you need him most. However I know anyone could, but he does have history. Plus everyone will have him now.

Tommo · 20/06/2016 at 09:36
Yeah, i'm not too sure on Lids either, I reckon Montagna is probably a better pick, although you may already have him.
If I was to pick out of those 3, I would get rid of Tracca as Kerridge has shown he can go big often, and Hall will come good.

Derek · 20/06/2016 at 09:40
out of those i would get rid of Petracca. first year players tend to get tired in the second half of the year and need a rest or score poorly.

Bolton's Blues · 20/06/2016 at 10:20
indeed they do get tired derek, but i think Petracca is still capable of holding down that F7 spot for the rest of the year.
im stuck with the same decision but not considering trading petracca, keep hall or kerridge, at the moment ive kept Hall, but might change it

TRIGGER HAPPY · 20/06/2016 at 10:24
I'm keeping petrecca as a f7/m9 DPP with a plan to upgrade to Dahl just on the final
Kerridge will get at least another week as that 120 is still in his 3 round avg so has a bit more coin to make.
AMT to either dils or joey this week with the the other one joining my team next week through Kerridge. Both have fairly high Be.

The Beard · 20/06/2016 at 12:15
Thanks for feedback lads. So general consent is Petracca to go ahead of Hall (unless not named) and Kerrige?
Most people seem to say not Lids? I've got Martin, Zorko, Wells who well would you take? I was taking Dahl but no point for a month+ to sit there looked at Merrett and Montagna though he worries me a bit with his real low scores…
Any genuine advise on this if I don't take Lids?

Daz · 20/06/2016 at 10:21
I see him with Kerridge as being the last to be upgraded and strong sides will do this through the bye periods. Your call.

Bolton's Blues · 20/06/2016 at 10:59
if you have trades, libba yes.
Petracca is capable of holding M9/F7 spot for a little longer