Weekend Worries – Mick The Mad Irishman

Filed in Mick The Mad Irishman, Supercoach by on March 27, 2013 • views: 1891

weekend worriesWeekend Worries

I am sure you have all heard the term Murphy’s Law, “Anything that can go wrong, will go wrong”. Well for me personally this couldn’t have been truer about the players I selected in Friday night’s opener. I’m guessing I’m not the only one who went to bed on either Friday or Saturday night asking myself, “WHY DID I PICK HIM”. But pick them we did, and what we must remind ourselves is that we picked them for a reason. So were our reasons for picking them so far off or were the weekend’s games just a blip on what might otherwise be a great season. Let’s go through the most popular underperforming picks of the weekend and analysis if there is any cause for concern.

Patrick Dangerfield

What can I say community. I am sure I was called all manner of things over the weekend for my recommendation to pick Dangermouse. I had ideas of grandeur of Paddy running amuck on Friday night, scoring goals, laying tackles, clearance after clearance. What transpired was Dangerfield’s worse SC score since the 7th of August 2011. He had a mere 17 disposals running at just 35% efficiency, had 4 clangers and 2 free kicks against. He coped the first tag as was to be expected and just couldn’t manage to break it all night. If I was just to look at these stats in isolation I would have to be very alarmed and even considering a corrective trade before round 3. However I still think not much has changed with Dangerfield. This is still that same powerful midfield player that has the ability to rank up contested possessions, tear games wide open and kick goals. Friday night was just not his night. He did cop a few heavy knocks early and did leave the field in the second quarter which not too many people actually noticed. There were also suggestions he had a bout of the flu in the lead up to the game. I did write the following about Danger in the preseason and I still stand by it.

“With that element of inefficiency I still expect so see a few scores under 100 in 2013, but far fewer than the 9 in 2012 and on the other side with the expected improvement in key areas I expect to see even more monster scores over 130 and if everything all comes together in the one game don’t be surprised if we gain another member to the 200 point club”

I would have liked to have seen one of those 130+ games first up but Dangerfield will bounce back and this will, in all probability be the lowest score he will get all year. That been the case, it would really be a stupid idea to trade him out in anger, when you’ve already picked up his lowest score and in my option will still average out the season the same as any of the players in his price bracket.

Verdict:

If you’ve picked him, stick with him. He’ll pay you back over the season.
If you’ve gone in without him, track him over the next few weeks and you may be able to snag him as a first upgrade for a fraction of his starting price.

Brendon Goddard

This selection doesn’t have me worried in the slightest. I ended up selecting Goddard because I went into the season with a “Guns and Rookies” strategy in my backline and Goddard is as safe as they come when picking premium defenders. I think a lot of people went into this season thinking (hoping) Goddard would find his way back to the 130 average he had in 2010. For me that was never going to happen and I will be expecting Goddard to average close to what he averaged last year around 105. Saying this should I not be concerned that he only scored 86 SC points in the opening round?? Well in short, no!

The way I see it Goddard had just a mere 14 disposals at the weekend and still managed to get that many points, showing how devastating he can be when he does get his hands on the ball. He had 13 kicks, just one handball, took 7 marks, kicked a goal and laid 2 tackles. His disposal numbers were his lowest since round 10, 2011, where in that game he scored just 57 SC points. Again don’t be surprised if these are Goddard’s lowest disposal numbers all year. Essendon didn’t recruit this man and pay out all that money for him to be stuck out on a wing all season. I suspect Hirdy and Bomber Thompson will be looking at way to utilise him more as the season progresses. There will be plenty of games where his disposal numbers will be in the high 20’s and these are the games I will be happy he is in my side. Just to remind everybody he did have 9 scores below 100 last season with lows of 58, 67 and 57 and he still managed to average 101.2.

Verdict:

No brainer: Keeper for the year and will be easily in the top 6 defenders when round 23 has drawn to a close.

Dyson Heppell

What people must remember here is that Heppell is priced to average 84.1 SC points. He managed to score 73 SC points, which while isn’t ideal isn’t actually a disaster either.

I know a lot of people didn’t actually pick him to score 84 SC points and were looking at him to have a break out year and this is where much of their frustration lies. However before I go any further I would like to point out that two of the biggest breakout stars of last year didn’t actually set the world on fire in their opening rounds last year. In fact Dangerfield started with scores of 93 and 92 and Dayne Beams started with scores of 69 and 67. So don’t think for a minute because he has only scored 73 points first up that you’ve selected a breakout dud.

To be honest I seen a lot to like about Heppell on Friday night. He started the game in the centre and looked really good through the middle. He actually had 10 disposals by quarter time and was looking set to post some big numbers. I am not sure why but for the rest of the game Heppell was brought back across the half backline in what must have been a tactical change made at ¼ time. It didn’t appear he was asked to do a job on anyone in particular but his time in the middle was limited for the remainder of the game. The consequence saw his potential big score fizzle out. However one must think if he was trusted enough to start in the centre for the first bounce up that he will get plenty more time in the midfield as the season goes on and may well be that Breakout that people picked him hoping he would be.

Verdict:

If you picked him I have seen nothing in the first outing that suggests that you should be looking at a sideways trade. May take a few rounds before he starts building some breakout scores.
If you’ve gone in without him, whack him on the watchlist. I’ve seen enough to still suggest he is breakout material.

Patrick Ryder

Community this is the one player that frustrated me the most, and of all the underperforming popular picks over the weekend the one I am most concerned about. Patrick managed just 4 disposals on Friday night and a very modest 11 hitouts and was never in a position to mark the ball inside 50, never mind kick any goals. This was Patrick’s lowest disposal count since his debut season all the way back in 2006. So why was his output so far down on what he has shown in the last two seasons at least?

Well we should have all known that Bellchambers was going into this season taking the number one ruck role, with Patrick playing more forward and pinch hitting in the ruck. In NAB round 3 he played his new role perfectly leading up the gound, taking 6 marks, finding the pill 21 times and kicking 3 goals and looked like the perfect Ruck/Forward Swing option. On Friday night he looked lost across the half forward line with Essondon preferring to go deep inside 50 looking to hit up Michael Hurley and to a lesser extent Stewart Crameri and Jake Melksham. At no point in the game did Patrick go to the full forward position and in no point in the game was he a target for any of Essendon’s inside 50’s. This was the most alarming statistic I picked up over the entire weekend and one that has my hand very close to the trade button.

Going forward you would think that Ryder is far too good a player to not be utilised more by Essendon. I picked him because I feel he is everywhere as good a key forward as Tom Hawkins and Taylor Walker with the added bonus that he was going to be getting some time in the Ruck to give him some level of consistency over those other Key Forwards. On Friday night’s evidence I may have to rethink this assessment.

Verdict

Essendon play Melbourne at the MCG in round 2. He has to show me that 20 disposal, 3 goals a game player I picked him for. Anything less and I will be recommending a corrective trade come round 3. Roughead has now been locked into my watchlist and one I will be monitoring over the first two rounds. (Still not sold on him at this stage)

Dean Cox

Dean is very unfortunate to make it onto this list. He did after all score 96 SC points. The reason he gets a mention is because a lot of coaches put the VC on him hoping he would bang out a Monster Score taking the sole ruck duty while Naitanui is out of the team. It just didn’t pan out on Saturday night but I do want to stress that Dean Cox is still the best Ruck/Forward option available at the moment. He did win the Ruck contest at the weekend with 36 hitouts to Griffin’s 20. He also had more disposals than Griffin but yet Griffin scored 116 SC points. This has got less to do with Cox and more to do with Fremantle’s midfield who just dominated the clearances winning both Griffins and limiting Cox’s hitouts to advantage. It won’t happen every week that West Coast will lose the midfield battle when they do get up Cox’s scores will increase accordingly.

Verdict

No panic required here. Shouldn’t even be a second thought to trade the big man out.

Luke Sheuy

Averaged 103 SC points last year and was tipped by many to have a break out year where he would take his game to that top level of midfield elites. Saturday night saw Sheuy score just 56 SC points in what was a horrible night for the youngster. Every midfielder in the comp will now shudder when he hears the words “Ryan Crowley”. This man has rightly made a name for himself as the greatest tagger in the game at present. Unfortunately for Sheuy and all those coaches who selected him on Saturday night Crowley managed to put more weight behind that a argument. He kept Luke to just 12 disposals all night.

If you want some sort of positive from any of that is that this is actually an improvement on the last time Crowley tagged him in round 19 last season. On that night Luke managed 11 disposals and just 40 SC points. So in theory there is nothing to say he won’t improve on all his scores in similar fashion, turning his scores of 110 into 120’s in games where he does get off the leash.

The fact is, Sheuy is still more of an outside player than an inside player and I don’t think that is going to change too much this year. In games where West Coast are going to be beaten on the inside like they were against Fremantle, Sheuy’s output is going to suffer. However like I said with Cox above, this isn’t going to happen every week and when West Coast do win the inside battle Sheuy will destroy teams on the outside.

Verdict

Managed to average 103 SC points last year with scores of 85, 80, 40, 75, 66, and 84. Don’t be foolish and think this round 1 score is going to be indicative of his output for the rest of the year. Is still a very real change to finish the year with an average of 110 SC points. If you’ve picked him, KEEP HIM.

Scott Selwood

Scot Selwood is very much in the same mould as Luke Sheuy with many of their key indicators the same. Both 22, averaged 25 and 23 disposals respectively in 2012, both averaged 10 contested possessions a game, both run at 75% efficiency and they averaged 104 and 103 SC points respectively.

So without repeating myself too much the same applies to Selwood as has been written about Sheuy above. Last season Selwood scored 82 and 71 SC points in the games against Fremantle so his 81 SC points on the weekend is very much on par with what he has done in the past.

Verdict

Exactly the same as Shuey, if you’ve picked him, KEEP HIM.

Final Word

The best round to have a low score is round one. This will mean that this score is only going to be in the players rolling average for one week and will only affect their price in round 3. If they have a low score during the year it will spend three weeks in their rolling average and affect their score over those three weeks. If all these popular picks bounce back in the next couple of weeks they won’t actually drop in value as much as a lot of coaches think they will.
Don’t panic community and hopefully this weekend will provide us with better scores from our popular picks.

Stay Tuned…

Mick the Mad Irishman

 

 

Tags: , , , , ,

Comments (42)

Trackback URL | Comments RSS Feed

  1. Any other concerns on any other player over the weekend and I will be happy to provide you with a second option. Just leave a comment in the box :D

  2. Br0d0 says:

    Freo's three gun on-ballers Barlow, Fyfe and Mundy were all great value this season. While I flirted with picking all three I ended up with Fyfe only. He did ok but performed the worst of the three. Wish I had gone with Mundy now.

    • Mick The Mad Irishman says:

      Don’t panic Br0d0.
      I do went with Fyfe over both Mundy and Barlow. We have only had one game to judge the three on. I am sure as the season goes on all three will end up averaging pretty similarly. The Derby suited both Mundy and Barlows game style over Fyfe’s and there will be plenty of games where that will be the opposite.

      If you still like the look on Mundy why don’t you pick a player around the same price as a smokey and if they don’t perform swap them for Mundy after round 2. Hannabury or Boak spring to mind. This is what I plan to do.

  3. Eugene says:

    What's your take on Priddids, Fyfe and Duffield mate?

  4. Matty says:

    I currently have birchall in my team, with suckling’s injury should I be worried about some low scores with birchall possibly getting more attention from opposition ?

    • pdid says:

      well said, there's no way he can average his 2012 scores given the situation down back for hawthorn. Lost run in Suckling / Young, Birchall's output can do nothing but suffer on the back of that!

  5. Matty says:

    Also great article mate

  6. Pouring Jars says:

    Got Matty De Boer late in the draft… Was expecting more of him. Reckon he will step up or have Walters and Pearce got in first?

  7. Gilly says:

    Any thoughts on Kane Mitchell?? Has been elevated but no one put onto the long term injury risk surely job security an issue. Any suggestions to replace him have Wines, Crouch, O'Meara and Viney and about 200k

    • pdid says:

      Koby Stevens has better job security, and with no Boyd in midfield first few weeks he will get tonnes of time in the guts. Will cost you more but end of the day you'll make more money off of a player playing 12/12 games leading in to a bye round, rather than 5-6/12 ^_^ and let's face it, no matter who you are picking in your team there you are putting them in only to make money!

    • SCaddict says:

      I think he's taken Nick Salter's spot who will be on the long term injury list for at least the next 6-8 weeks. So assuming Mitchell can perform ok and gather regular games until then he will probably have served his function as a cash cow by that stage.

      Others to look at under $200K include Koby Stevens, Brad Hill, Rampe, Vlastuin and Toumpas depending on who is named in Rd 1 and who isn't.

  8. Jarrad says:

    Nice article Mad Mick. Im waiting for Dangerfields next game to see if the tag is going to affect him again before i consider trading him to most likely Murphy.

    I was wondering what your thoughts on Bellchambers were? With all this Eggandhamburger gossip going on and him perhaps not getting up for a few weeks i selceted Bellchambers thinking he did look like he was in for a really good year. Is 71 a pass do you think?

  9. Mac says:

    Thoughts on Duffield Mick?

  10. Butch says:

    What everyones thoughts on Hartlett? I went Hartlett in the Backline instead of Rich in the Midfield..Would like to hear your opinion thanks
    Butch

    • SCaddict says:

      I have in my DT but not SC. His recurring hammy problems needs to be considered but if he can stay healthy he should have a fantastic season.

  11. Tom says:

    A. Swallow or Cotchin as my M4?

  12. Butch says:

    M4 is JPK looking for M5 or B4

  13. Tom says:

    Who can I put as my M4 now that Stevie J is out of the picture..?
    Have 570k to spend….

  14. @PortJ04 says:

    NO SAM ROWE!
    Disappointing, will you hold onto him?

  15. Sean says:

    Vlastuin named as emergency??? What is going on!!! Team is looking very shaky atm!!

    • SCaddict says:

      Yeah that was my worry with him from the get go so he was never in my team. Probably needs a Tige or two to go down or have a couple of poor performances as otherwise the best I can see for him in the short term is maybe as a vest boy.

      Of course if the Tiges get slaughtered by the Blues again Dimma may need a major rethink on his starting 18 and Vlastuin will probably come into debut calculations then.

  16. Gedransom says:

    What are peoples thoughts on forwards Mitch Robinson, Varcoe, Karnezis and even Byrnes from melb?

    • Matty says:

      Between the players you have mentioned there is no doubt that you have to give Karneszis a run.

  17. Tom says:

    What's everyone's thoughts on Matera from GC?

    • Matty says:

      Matera will be Dreamteam and SuperCoach average a
      50/70 average at best if that’s what you’re looking for then best of Luck bro.

  18. Leroy says:

    Is anyone going to look at Luke Ball?
    With their depth in the mid field, will he roam free, any thoughts?

  19. Leroy says:

    Is anyone going to look at Luke Ball?

  20. Steven says:

    Have Terlich and Docherty in the backline, neither of whom look like playing. Which one to trade and for who, or should both go out? Need to trade at least one so I have a full team on the park.

    • Gilly says:

      I'd let Docherty go myself, didn't do much in the NAB cup. I have kept Terlich in my side, I think he is a better longer term prospect

  21. MJlong says:

    I am thinking of dropping buddy now and picking him up again after round 7…

  22. Whether enjoying a little league, high school, college or major league baseball game, fans should remember these
    important items before leaving for the ballpark.
    The mini spy pen camera is available in 4GB, 8GB and 16 GB for regular use as per requirement of the customer.
    s r CMOS sensor, BIONZ impression processor chip in addition to a Sony Grams
    contact with powerful (10x optical move, 25-250 mm range) wide-angel mega-zoom (26
    mm) help in choosing stunning golf swings quite possibly with low-light circumstances.

  23. Greetings from California! I’m bored to death at work so I decided to check out your blog on my iphone during lunch break. I love the info you provide here and can’t wait to take a look when I get home.
    I’m amazed at how quick your blog loaded on my phone .. I’m not even using WIFI, just 3G .
    . Anyways, awesome blog!

  24. I am regular reader, how are you everybody? This article posted at this site is truly

    pleasant.

  25. It’s in fact very complicated in this busy life to listen news on Television, therefore I simply use internet for that purpose, and obtain the most recent news.

  26. Boil the game down to that match-up, and it’s true. The Lions seemed to lack leadership in 2012, but the moment you wish to view other independent channels, there is no right time to show off your skill but to join NOW fantasy von miller jersey football. The Texans also have an explosive offense but their defense has been their Achilles heel the entire season. E S for Sandy Hook Elementary School on their helmets today.

  27. I loved as much ass youu will receive carried out right
    here. The sketch is tasteful, your authored material stylish.
    nonetheless, you comand get bought an shakiness over that
    yyou wish bbe delivering the following. unwell unquestionably come
    further formerly againn as exactly the same
    nearly a lot often ibside case you shield this increase.

  28. I have read so many posts about the blogger lovers except this post is actually a
    fastidious post, keep it up.

  29. prep 101 says:

    Heya! I understand this is kind of off-topic but I
    had to ask. Does running a well-established website
    such as yours require a large amount of work? I’m completely new to writing a blog but
    I do write in my journal everyday. I’d like to start a
    blog so I can easily share my experience and views online.
    Please let me know if you have any ideas or tips for new aspiring bloggers.

    Thankyou!

    For an incredible response please checkout this amazing site:
    prep 101